Cry For Vaccine Freedom Wall

Welcome to NVIC's Cry For Vaccine Freedom Wall. Many familes and professionals have experienced vaccine harassment and coercion and have had to make hard decisions about employment. When kicked out of a medical practice for not vaccinating, many must seek out health care providers upholding the informed consent ethic. NVIC provides this space for the public to share their stories and they appear chronologically. Click to view stories about vaccine reactions and vaccine failures.

Scroll down to the bottom of the page for options on reporting vaccine harassment, failures and reactions. When you submit your stories to NVIC your identity will be kept confidential.

Loading...
  • Posted: Jun. 4, 2024
    I was a healthcare worker in Maine from the time I graduated x-ray school in 1993. In 1996 I cross-trained into MRI and have worked in that field since. I received the flu shot in 1993 (being young and naive) and was sick in bed for a week with bronchitis that winter. I opted to not get another shot, as I have never been as sick as I was since then. Fast forward to 2017 and I had left my MRI job for a few years to help my husband with his business, as he was self-employed. Going back to work I noticed the landscape had changed tremendously. I had signed a waiver over the years declining the flu shot, but now was forced to wear a mask through flu season if I still refused. I reluctantly wore one, as the more I dug into flu shots and other vaccines convinced me that they were not safe or effective. In 2020 when COVID "hit", I was still wearing a mask through flu season. For a short duration, my employer told me that I did not need to wear a mask any longer as we needed to save resources due to the coming pandemic. Really?? So it's ok to not wear one when you say so?, was my thought. It wasn't but 2-3 weeks later when everyone was required to wear a mask. In the meantime the Maine legislature had passed a law that was going into effect the end of 2021 that would strip healthcare worker's philosophical and religious rights to opt out of the flu shot, and would only allow for a medical exemption. So in 2021 when the COVID shot was being mandated by October, I was told that I wasn't being "fired", but would be removed from the schedule until I was in compliance. So between the COVID and flu shot mandate, and no exemptions allowed, (a medical exemption was near impossible to obtain), I was forced to make a decision: find another profession or go out of state. I ultimately ended up moving to New Hampshire as they still allow religious exemptions. I was told in Maine that I was a threat to my patients by not being vaccinated, yet today I work for 3 different hospitals (one full time, and 2 per-diem) and have yet to call out sick after 2.5 years being non-compliant. I wouldn't change a thing and have no regrets about my decision. I miss my family I left behind in Maine, but am grateful God gave me the strength to stand for what I believe in. My only disappointment is that not more of my healthcare family said "no" to the shot. If they had, they would have been forced to change their policy.
  • Posted: Jun. 3, 2024
    I was denied care for my infant 14 years ago when I declined to vaccinate at a pediatricians office where I had already established care for my child. The pediatrician who had previously seen my son was unavailable and I was willing to see the other pediatrician in the practice since it was "just a well check". She refused to see my child or even speak to me personally. I wasn't worth her time for lack of profit. I had to go to many pediatricians to find one who wouldn't persist in "encouraging" me to vax my kids. My son is now 15 and perfectly healthy. My unvaxxed 7 year old is perfectly healthy as well. Their older brother who is now 18 is vaccine injured and disabled. So many pediatricians I have interacted with over the years totally discount family history and discount vaccine injury as even partial environmental causation or exacerbation of his disabilities. It's disgusting.
  • Posted: Apr. 7, 2024
    The following account is public knowledge and filed online in PACER. The case is M. B. pro per v. Respironics CA LLC et al. ( now a defunct Philips subsidiary) Case in Federal District Court, Southern District of California : 3:23-cv-00580-GPC-VET Intro to first amended complaint This is an action by plaintiff, who was subjected to defendant’s corporate wide SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccination Program (“Vaccine Mandate”) and was wrongfully terminated for refusing to comply. In this action, plaintiff claims that application of the Vaccine Mandate to him constituted unlawful invasions of inalienable rights to his privacy and bodily autonomy – including the right to make an informed decision to decline the COVID-19 vaccine injection. The defendants’ invasion of plaintiff’s privacy rights was compounded by defendant’s lack of due diligence or reckless neglect on not informing employees of the true risks and lack of benefit of the COVID-19 vaccines, information defendants suppressed to use the Vaccine Mandate as an opportunity, a pretext to a massive reduction in force across their North America operations without incurring severance and unemployment expenses. Plaintiff brings this complaint (‘Complaint’) suing all named defendants herein for economic, non-economic, compensatory, consequential, and punitive damages under peremptory international norms (codified into California statutes) that ban any form of coercion of experimental medicine, under the inalienable right to privacy and bodily autonomy expressly protected in the California Constitution, under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, and under other provisions of law pursuant to the causes of action claimed herein. Plaintiff has strong convictions that the allegations made herein violated his constitutional and civil rights, and that defendants acted in bad faith by terminating his employment after 9 years of excellent service to the company for unreasonable cause. Plaintiff exercised his inalienable rights and refused to receive any COVID-19 injections, was illegally terminated by defendants, and denied the benefit of severance because he exercised his rights. Application of a Vaccine Mandate to each employee thus constituted an unlawful employment practice, defendants lacked a genuine justification based on actual belief and reasonable basis, it was unable to show a vital business necessity for employees to be injected, and the Program was not shown to be tailored to be no broader in scope than necessary to meet business necessity. Defendants also engaged in unlawful retaliation under FEHA when it terminated employees including plaintiff or others for resisting or opposing application of defendant’s unlawful Program. Plaintiff claims he was wrongfully terminated by defendants when they falsely claimed he resigned from his job for personal reasons. Plaintiff alleges he was actually discharged under the pretext of not complying with a companywide vaccine mandate issued from Philips North America operations and, that defendant enforced their own mandate, without duress from any government policy at time of discharge, and not for reasons of safety as they claimed. Plaintiff alleges he was discriminated against for a sincerely held religious belief among other serious and justified objections to the vaccine mandate that were stated in the letter. Plaintiff alleges many of his personal rights, afforded by the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the State of California, particularly his right to privacy, were violated by defendants not responding to plaintiff’s letter. Plaintiff also alleges defendants violated an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by defendants’ fraudulently declaring and recording an untruthful reason and cause for his discharge. Plaintiff alleges these defendants’ actions created a stigma on plaintiff’s professional reputation and his lifelong, untarnished employment record that has disadvantaged and possibly permanently damaged his ability to gain new employment. It's very difficult to engage an attorney against the vaccines. But that shouldn't stop anyone who has a will and a sense of liberty and lots of faith. Fight!
  • Posted: Mar. 7, 2024
    I had enrolled my son at Sacred Heart Elementary to enter first grade. He attended their summer program. I paid tuition in full. A week before school starts I receive a call from the nurse that I have to get him fully vaccinated within a week, school was starting, if he wanted to attend. At this point, I don’t have a second option. The other school I had applied for dropped my application and is now full. I am out of a school option. Apparently the Seattle Archdiocese is illegally disallowing religious exemptions to attend school. I’ve also come to find this happened to several people when it was initially instated in feb 2020. People who were already attending and entrenched in the community received a phone call they had to get vaccinated in a week or leave. They also then refused my sine’s polio tither results, which showed he was immune to types 1 and 3, because it didn’t include type 2, but type 2 has been eradicated since 1999 I believe is the year, so labs don’t test for it anymore.

Vaccine Reporting Systems - You Have Options!

Learn about the different reporting options NVIC has created for you to post your personal experiences with vaccination and publicly share your concerns with others. Choose one or more options below to share your experience. If you have experienced a vaccine reaction, we encourage you to use the button below to report it to NVIC, and also encourage you to report your reaction to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to assist in identifying vaccine safety signals. Click to learn more about VAERS and how to search the VAERS database for reported vaccine reactions.
Opens in new tab, window
Opens an external site
Opens an external site in new tab, window